Kent Hovind Defeats Michael Shermer in debate

Great Debate enjoy!  For more great information visit CREATION TODAY/

Dr. William Lane Craig vs Kevin Scharp

In this debate Dr. William Lane Craig wins easily.  Kevin Scharp doesn't even bring arguments to the debate.  The topic was evidence for or against God's existence.  Although Craig does bring arguments and evidence for God...Scharp doesn't bring any arguments against God but messes up in the debate and only complains about Craig's evidence.
        As we all know in debate you must bring arguments and debunk your opponents arguments.  Scharp not only fails to debunk any of Craig's arguments but he forgot to bring arguments for his side.  In a weird moment Scharp just shows charts and expresses how he is for Gay Marriage which wasn't even the topic of the debate.
     Craig doesn't even have to debunk any arguments as Scharp didn't bring any.  Let's say Scharp wasn't sharp at all.  The best part of the debate is at the end.  Audience members ask questions and even the audience realizes Scharp lost the debate as they ask him "Where is your evidence" and Scharp has none.

Christian Dinesh D'Souza debates & defeats David Silverman atheist

In this debate David Silverman comes off very mean and angry at Christianity yet he never presents a reason "why" someone should be against it.  Being the one trick pony that David Silverman is he uses the same old and boring arguments against God.  David comes off angry that God doesn't support homosexuality, or abortion but as usual with these Debates the Christian comes off very intelligent.

The Christian is Dinesh D'Souza and he is very polished and skilled as a debater stating facts and providing actual proof and evidence for his claims.  However David comes off as all over the place never really explaining why atheism is better than Christianity?

In the Debate David messes up and quotes atheistic countries as being better but when we looked up the suicide rates they were a lot higher than other normal countries.  Dinesh is very interesting to listen to and he wins this debate by a mile.

Dr. William Lane Craig vs Sam "ho-hum" Harris

In this debate Sam Harris bores the audience to tears as he rambles on about vomit (yes I kid you not) and compares morality to a chess move on a chess board.  Dr. Craig points out that what Sam Harris is really doing is trying to "re-define" morality as good moves on a chess board...but Craig easily points out Harris's error.

    Craig correctly points out that a wrong move in chess is not evil nor is a good move good in the sense of a moral good.  The reviewers of Sam Harris's book pulled no punches when in many words they said "Sam Harris" book is not rational and doesn't follow reason and logic.  Craig very eloquently destroys Sam Harris in this debate or as he is known now "Sam Ho-Hum Harris" as his speaking is so boring that if it wasn't for Craig I think the entire audience would have died of boredom and Sam Harris vomit stories.

Dr. William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens

In this debate Craig dominates the debate with sharp intelligence. Hitchens is rambling and incoherent. Even commonsenseatheism blog which is run by atheists said and we quote " . Frankly, Craig spanked Hitchens like a foolish child. Perhaps Hitchens realized how bad things were for him after Craig’s opening speech, as even Hitchens’ rhetorical flourishes were not as confident as usual.

Atheist Richard Carrier vs Christian David Marshall Is the Christian faith reasonable?

In this debate Richard Carrier tries to show atheism is more rational than Christianity but he never is able to provide proof and evidence that would show atheism is accurate and correct.  Carrier uses the old outdated and errored way of logic that if evil exists then God doesn't exist but it backfires on Carrier in this debate as he obsesses about death and disease in the world.

Dr. William Lane Craig vs Bart Ehrman

In this video Dr. William Lane Craig debates Bart Ehrman but Bart never debunks Craigs facts.